Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (5) TMI 359

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Appellant. Shri S.M. Tata, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. -  This stay application seeks exemption from pre-deposit of duty and penalty imposed under Order-in-Original No. 25/03-Cus., dated 30-7-2003 of the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Thiruvananthapuram. The total duty demand is over Rs. 38 lakhs. There is an equal amount of penalty. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....order on the stay application. 3. The aforesaid duty demand has arisen in regard to the import of two consignments - motor parts/condenser through Air Cargo Complex, Thiruvananthapuram vide Bill of Entry No. 3446, dated 21-7-1997 and 3515, dated 25-7-1997 by the appellant. The appellant declared the value of Singapore Dollar 3 FOB per piece for the condensor. The goods were originally asse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ported at Thiruvananthapuram were of Chinese origin. The Commissioner did not accept this explanation as it was the evidence that both imports were of Sanden Corporation Ltd., Japan and the goods were the same. The present appeal is also basically on the same ground. 4. On perusal of the records we are of the opinion that prima facie there is a very strong case against the appellant. While....