Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (3) TMI 564

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ikh, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  The appeal arose out of the order of Commissioner (Appeals) who in the impugned order confirmed duty demanded by the lower authority amounting to Rs. 1,06,176/-. 2. The appellant is a manufacturer of Texturised Synthetic Yarn falling under Chapter Heading No. 5402 of CETA. A comparison of clearances of their product in 94-95 shown in the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l can sustain when the balance sheet shows a higher figure of clearance of excisable goods compared to the one shown in the excise records. I observe that such a discrepancy is enough to raise an initial presumption against the assessee. By doing so the Department shifts the burden on to the assessee to prove that the goods involved are not produced and removed without payment of duty. In the pres....