2006 (2) TMI 301

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Bilal Nazki, J. - Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. These appeals are filed against the common order passed by the Company Judge in C.P. Nos. 94, 105 and 106 of 2001, dated 7-6-2002. 3. The allegation of the company petitioners against the respondents was that they had violated the provisions contained in section 108A of the Companies Act, 1956 (for brevity 'the Act'), which imp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....itioners is not permissible under the provisions of the Act. The 'Court' is defined under section 2(11) of the Act, which states that "(a) with respect to any matter relating to a company (other than any offence against this Act), the Court having jurisdiction under this Act with respect to that matter relating to that company, as provided in section 10. (b)...". This makes it clear that the 'Cour....