Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (3) TMI 512

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... SDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  None is present on behalf of the appellants. However, a request has been received for adjournment of the hearing to 30th September, 2004. I find that the hearing was adjourned earlier three times and hence, the present request for further adjournment for six months is declined. 2.  Heard Shri S.S. Bhagat, learned SDR for the department. He s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Commissioner (Appeals) had the power to condone the delay up to three months at the material time. The appellants had prayed for condonation of delay on the ground that their counsel met with an accident. As such, I am of the view that the impugned order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) rejecting the application for condonation of delay is not justified. I also find that the Commissioner (....