Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2003 (11) TMI 475

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Appellant. Shri M.H. Sheikh, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Heard both sides. The appeal No. E2621/03 involves duty of Rs. 8,06,040/- and penalty of Rs. 8,06,040/-. A preliminary point was raised whether this case can be heard by a single Member Bench as the duty and penalty together exceed Rs. 10 Lakhs. A reading of Section 35D (3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 makes it clear tha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2,582/- only and he also states that an amount of Rs. 82,784/- has already been paid during pendency of the adjudication proceedings. 3. Considering the above, the appellants are directed to pre-deposit a sum of Rs. 3 Lakhs within a period of eight weeks from today and report compliance to the Commissioner (Appeals) thereafter. Subject to such pre-deposit being made and compliance reported....