Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (3) TMI 373

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t stating that Dinesh Mirchandani was carrying on business as the sole proprietor of the plaintiff. It was stated that the plaintiff is carrying on business of providing human resources facilitation by locating right candidates suitable for top level managerial positions. It was stated that defendant No. 1, represented through as also acting through Sanjay Kumar, its director, (Defendant No. 2) held personal meetings as also exchanged proposals through e-mails. It was stated that defendant No. 2 negotiated and concluded a written contract. As per the said contract, plaintiff was to identify and recommend to defendant No. 1, after interviewing, suitable candidates. Plaintiff did so but defendants cancelled the contract. It was stated that po....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f a plaint is a decree as per definition of a decree under section 2 sub-section 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. But I am not relegating parties to the remedy of appeal for the reason notwithstanding the fact that the Court was considering an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by defendant No. 2 i.e. Dinesh Kumar, the Court has struck off his name from the array of defendants. 10. Learned counsel for the parties treated the order being under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure i.e. addition and deletion of parties in a suit. 11. Order 1 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure requires that where right to relief in respect of or arising out of the same Act or transaction or series of ac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Ram Parshad v. CIT [1973] 1 SCR 985. Following passage has been relied upon:- "Through an agent as such is not a servant, a servant is generally for some purposes his master's implied agent, the extent of the agency depending upon the duties or position of the servant. It is again true that a director of a company is not a servant but an agent inasmuch as the company cannot act in its own person but has only to act through directors who qua the company have the relationship of an agent to its capacity. Managing Director may have a dual capacity." 18. I am afraid, learned counsel for the petitioner has got it all wrong. 19. It is settled law that a company is a juristic person. Therefore, a company has to Act through a living hu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ird parties. Such contracts which are concluded by the agent on behalf of his principal with third parties would bind the principal to the third party. 25. Section 230 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 reads as under :- "Agent cannot personally enforce, nor be bound by, contracts on behalf of principal.-In the absence of any contract to that effect an agent cannot personally enforce contracts entered into by him on behalf of his principal, nor is he personally bound by them. Presumption of contract to contrary.-Such a contract shall be presumed to exist in the following cases:- (1)where the contract is made by an agent for the sale or purchase of goods for a merchant resident abroad; (2)where the agent does not disclose the na....