Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2003 (12) TMI 471

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... [Order]. -  Appellants has been penalized Rs. 1 lakh under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 and an amount of Indian Currency of Rs. 1.55 lakhs found at his residence has been confiscated under Section 121 of the Customs Act, 1962 as sale proceeds of smuggled gold. 2. The brief facts relevant are :- "The Officers recovered contraband Gold from the ships cabin accepted an....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and considering the material on records it is found :- (a)        The reliance placed on E. Abdul Rehman's statement by the department especially that for 150 biscuits of gold he got Rs. 1.50 lakhs from Hussain, would lead to the conclusion that Rs. 1.50 lakh found kept at the residence of the appellant was meant as payment for carrying and delivery of the go....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the ld. Advocate that the penalty has been imposed on the retracted statements of Shri E. Abdul Rehman is not upheld. Since E. Abdul Rehman's statement is corroborated on materials disclosed by him as regards the description of the place of a private residence. The statement of E. Abdul Rehman to have received Rs. 1.5 lakh, for this consignment, if gold under seizure now was successfully delive....