2004 (3) TMI 473

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Appellant. Shri L. Narasimha Murthy, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J) (Oral)]. - The appellants were directed by Stay Order Nos. 376 and 377/1998, dated 14-5-1998, to pre-deposit a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs. On such deposits, the balance of duties and penalties were waived. But the appellant did not comply with the terms of the Stay Order. Therefore, the appeal of M....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sp;The learned DR opposed the prayer and submits that in terms of the judgment in the case of Master Recording Co., reported in 2000 (125) E.L.T. 1020 (Tribunal), the appellants were required to have pre-deposited the entire amount in the cases where there is a long delay. He submits that unless he deposits the full amount, the appeal of M/s. Hamsons Steels cannot be restored. However, he did not ....