2004 (3) TMI 473

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J) (Oral)]. - The appellants were directed by Stay Order Nos. 376 and 377/1998, dated 14-5-1998, to pre-deposit a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs. On such deposits, the balance of duties and penalties were waived. But the appellant did not comply with the terms of the Stay Order. Therefore, the appeal of M/s. Hamsons Steels & Alloys Pvt. Ltd. was....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....bmits that in terms of the judgment in the case of Master Recording Co., reported in 2000 (125) E.L.T. 1020 (Tribunal), the appellants were required to have pre-deposited the entire amount in the cases where there is a long delay. He submits that unless he deposits the full amount, the appeal of M/s. Hamsons Steels cannot be restored. However, he did not seriously oppose the prayer to restore the ....