2004 (1) TMI 420
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ntendent of Central Excise, for the Appellant. Shri S. Jaikumar, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order]. - The factual matrix of the case is in a short compass. The capricious capers of a Chemical Examiner who keeps oscillating between two view points has precipitated two rounds of litigation culminating at the table of the Commissioner (Appeals). The first round of litigation arose ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n appeal before me. 3. From the case records I find that the Chemical Examiner has come up with a truly bewildering performance of confusion and inconsistency. The compendium of contradictions would have made any Assistant Commissioner enter into a state of Hamletian hamartia. Fortunately this Lower Adjudicator who was compelled to resort to a management of contradictions sought to shift t....
TaxTMI