2004 (7) TMI 370

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al and Rohan Modgil for the Petitioner. Ms. Puja Jain and Ms. Prem Lata Bansal for the Respondent. ORDER 1. Since at the relevant time, Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (for short 'the AAIFR'), was not functional order, dated 7 January 2004, passed by the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (for short 'the BIFR') was challenged by means of this wr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....evelopments by way of an affidavit,which has been done. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the operating agency. The Income-tax Department is represented by Ms. Premlata Bansal. No other respondent has chosen to appear. 3. In the additional affidavit filed by the petitioners on 15 July 2004, it is stated that the rehabilitation scheme sanctioned by the AAIFR vide order dat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....6-2004 Balance expenditure to be incurred Capital Expenditure 228 137 183 45 OTS of Canara Bank dues 1237 0 1237 0 OTS of Institutional/ debenture holders dues 1157 0 1157 0 Repayment of MSTC dues 383 0 275 108 Repayment of leasing companies dues 363 10 297 66 Payment of statutory dues 200 47 107 93 Pay....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in Court. He has been identified by learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Purohit reiterates what is stated in the affidavit and undertakes to the Court that he will strictly comply with the terms of the sanctioned scheme. He will remain bound by the undertaking given to the Court. 5. In view of the subsequent developments, projected in the additional affidavit, we feel that the scheme sanc....