2003 (11) TMI 416

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cates, for the Appellant. Shri T.K. Kar, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - All the stay petitions are being taken up together for disposal inasmuch as they arise out of the same impugned order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Jamshedpur vide which he has imposed personal penalty of Rs. 13,73,840/- on M/s. Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. under the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ngly contended that the appellants are receiving number of inputs and are maintaining huge voluminous records and are paying duty to the tune of Rs. 500 crores (approx.). As such, there can be no mala fide on their part so as to penalise them with penalty. 3.  Countering the arguments, Shri T.K. Kar, ld. SDR submits that if the said mistake on the part of the appellants was not detected by....