Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (1) TMI 399

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Deepak Kejriwal] under sections 433, 434 and 439 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956, before the learned single judge sitting in the company jurisdiction. The second (numbered) appeal as aforesaid is made by the company itself. 2. Factually, the petitioning creditor sold, supplied and delivered certain materials in between November 9, 2001 and June 22, 2002. The company duly accepted the goods without raising any objection. After giving credit a sum of Rs. 18,96,453.20 is unpaid along with the claim of interest at 24 per cent per annum. The company took two defences. The first one is that due to abrupt stoppage of supply the company suffered damages. In reply to the statutory notice the tune was for a sum of Rs. 50 lakhs wherein in the af....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Carves India Ltd. [1971] 41 Comp. Cas. 174 (Cal.) they contended that when the dispute is bona fide there is no question of putting condition. If the court has some doubt whether the disputes are bona fide or not and is not in a position to come to a definite conclusion that the disputes are mala fide and manufactured only to create a defence to the winding up petition, the court may stay the winding up proceeding and relegate the parties to an action on terms as to security or otherwise. This is not such a case. A further judgment is cited being in S.R.C. Steel (P.) Ltd., In re [ACO No. 110 of 2004]. In all, a Division Bench of this High Court held that the court of company jurisdiction would only give emphasis in admitting a winding up p....