Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2003 (6) TMI 412

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hen that for obtaining credit against an invoice issued by a secondary dealer should be registered and reject the claim of the assessee for the benefit of the Modvat credit in respect of invoice No. 05036, dated 6-4-94. 2. The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of cotton yarn, cotton fabric, man-made yarn and man-made fabric following under Chapters 52, 54 and 55 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appellants were availing benefit of Modvat credit in conformity with Section AA of Chapter V of the Central Excise Rules. It is stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Appeal as follows : "3. During the months of April and June, 1994, the Appellants availed of the credit of Modvat on Polyester Staple Fibre (hereinafter refe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ents for availment of credit. It was further alleged that PSF was not directly dispatched to the Appellants but the same was dispatched through RIL/Emsons, who in turn raised invoice in the Appellants' favour. (ii) The credit cannot be availed of based on original copies of invoices as duplicate copies alone were valid for availment of credit of Modvat." 3. On the basis of the reply and the arguments made by the Advocate for the assessee, the Additional Commissioner passed an Order-in-Original rejecting the claim of the assessee in paragraph 8.3. He held us as follows : "8.3. In terms of Notification No. 15/94-C.E. (N.T.) dated 30-3-94, Government prescribed the invoice issued by any of the following persons as a valid do....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd. The said M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd., has issued another invoice in favour of M/s. Emsons (Agencies) Pvt. Ltd., on account of Simplex Mills. The said M/s. Emsons Ltd., have then also issued an invoice in favour of the appellants unit covering any identical consignment while referring to payment of duty on the bill as per Reliance Industries Ltd., and invoice of the manufacturing unit. If the claim of the appellants that M/s. Emsons Ltd., were only acting as financier, the invoices should have been issued by M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd., in favour of the appellants unit on account of M/s. Emsons Ltd., and not the other way round. Therefore in this transaction two intermediatory have come into play i.e. M/s.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssued to them by M/s. RIL against the original invoice No. 050036, dated 6-4-94 issued by M/s. Terene Fibres India Ltd., in the name of M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd. Since M/s. RIL has not directly sold the goods to M/s. Simplex Mills Co. Ltd, Bombay-11 and the assessee has availed Modvat credit on the strength of sale Note of M/s. RIL mentioned above, the Modvat credit of Rs. 1,47,018.00 (Basic Rs. 1,27,842.00 + Addl. Rs. 19,176.00) availed by the assessee is not permissible to them." 6. He states that the sale note referred to in the show cause notice is in respect of the invoice No. 050036 and that he further states that both authorities have gone on a wrong footing namely the ownership of the goods in question. Goods in question....