2003 (9) TMI 563
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... Meena for the Appearing Parties. JUDGMENT 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the contents of the application. 2. The applicant filed a writ petition bearing S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6473 of 1991 in this Court against the Rajasthan State Agro Industries Corporation. It is stated therein that in case the writ petition is allowed the consequential monetary benefits ar....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... petition in the Court against the Rajasthan State Agro Industries Corporation. 5. It is not in dispute that the order of winding up of the Rajasthan State Agro Industries Corporation was kept in abeyance/stayed by the Court. Thus, though, winding up order was passed but it is lying stayed. The Official Liquidator has not been appointed as its liquidator. In view of these facts, though, prima f....
TaxTMI