Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2003 (2) TMI 387

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Sheikh, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Shri. J.H. Kurkure, ld. Consultant appearing on behalf of the appellants submits that the only ground for denial of credit in this case is that the appellants failed to avail the Modvat credit within a period of six months from the date of issue of the invoices in question. His contention is that the period involved in the present case is December....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pearing for the Revenue submits that since the appellants have failed to follow the procedure as per Rule 57F(2) they are not entitled to avail the Modvat credit beyond the period of six months. He also submits that the said circular has been issued on  23-4-1996 and as such it cannot have retrospective effect as the period in dispute involved is December, 1994. He also submits that the invoi....