2002 (11) TMI 713

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Atul Dixit, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Agrawal, Member (T)]. - M/s. D.C.M. Engineering Products have filed an application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. Shri S.C. Kamra, learned Advocate, submitted that the appellants manufacture unmachined iron castings using sand moulds and cores in their foundries; that for the preparation of sand moulds, they prepare resin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Commissioner to rectify the mistake in the Adjudication Order passed by him since the mistake was apparent from the record and was purely clerical or typographical in nature; that they reminded the Commissioner under their letters dated 25-1-2002 and 19-3-2002 for rectification of the said mistake; that they have received a communication/order dated 18-4-2002 signed by the Superintendent (Adjudica....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng the appeal against the Order dated 28-2-2001. He finally submitted that as they were pursuing the matter with the Commissioner for rectification of mistake crept in the order, there is sufficient cause for filing the appeal late and accordingly, the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned. 2. Opposing the prayer, Shri Atul Dixit, ld. SDR, submitted that the present appeal has been....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n coated shell sand holding that shell sand produced by them was excisable product. The Commissioner also gave his findings that the duty has to be paid on shell sand at the assessable value of Rs. 3,500/- to Rs. 4,400/- per M.T. for the period 1988-89 to 1992-93, Rs. 3,681.34 per M.T. for 1993-94 and Rs. 3,641.42 per M.T. for 1994-95. No appeal has been filed by the appellants against the said or....