Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (8) TMI 793

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i Rajeev Tandon, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.S. Bajaj, Member (J)]. - Heard. 2. We have heard both sides and gone through the impugned order. The Commissioner has failed, in our view, to comply with the directions given in the remand order and also to follow the ratio of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of U.O.I. v. Supreme Steels and General Mills, 2001 (1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Court judgment rendered in the case of UOI v. Supreme Steels and General Mills, supra, wherein the Apex Court has observed that the assessee has got right to opt out of the Compounded Levy Scheme and pay the duty on the basis of actual production. The Commissioner as is evident from the impugned order has taken the view contrary to the above referred judgment of the Apex Court and observed that t....