Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (12) TMI 514

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Appellant. Shri Atul Dixit, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice K.K. Usha, President]. - The issue involved in this appeal at the instance of the assessee is whether the appellant is eligible for the concessional rate of duty under Notification No. 9/99-C.E. 2. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of stainless steel cut wire shorts, high carbon steel cut wire ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... out they submitted an option on 28-6-99. The learned Counsel for the appellant would further contend that for the past period also they were claiming the benefit of the relevant notification and if the assessee was not claiming the benefit of Notification No. 9/99 there was no need for giving a declaration on 4-3-1999. 3. The learned DR strongly contended that going by the terms of the op....