Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (2) TMI 535

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice U.L. Bhat, President]. -  Appellant is absent and is not represented. There is no request for adjournment. We have heard Shri K. Srivastava, SDR. 2. The appellant filed 30 price lists on which jurisdictional Superintendent passed separate orders on various dates. Appellant had claimed deduction of 2% discount in respect of immediate/adv....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e of the appellant and adjourned the appeal to 12-11-1997. Appellant presented 29 supplementary appeals which were received in the Registry on 9-10-1997. There were no applications for condonation of delay. The papers contained only the memorandum of appeal and not the copies of the impugned orders. The appeal fees in respect of the supplementary appeals has also not been deposited. The Bench hear....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Mod/ST/10/88, dated 11-4-1988 which is serial No. 1 shown in paragraph 1 of the appellate order. 4. The dispute relates to 2% discount declared in respect of immediate/advance payment of which deduction was claimed in the relevant price list. The question is, whether the direction of the Superintendent that deduction would be allowed only in those cases where the discount has been actual....