2003 (4) TMI 414

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Appellant. Shri M.H. Sheikh, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : C. Satapathy, Member (T)]. -  Shri V.S. Sejpal, learned Chartered Accountant appearing for the appellants states that the impugned order has been passed ignoring letter of intimation given on 24th August, 2000 addressed to the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise. The said letter clearly specifies the details of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed and therefore, there is no case for confiscation of the impugned goods and imposition of penalty. 2. Shri M.H. Sheikh, learned J.D.R. appearing for the Revenue supports the impugned order passed by the Commissioner. 3. After hearing both sides and perusal of case records, we find that the show cause notice dated 6-8-2001 alleges that the appellants misdeclared their premises at ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re subjected to some process. Even, the Chemical Examiner's report cited in the impugned order also states that the product OMC at both places were different. It is, therefore, apparent that on the one hand a charge has been made that the second place was misdeclared as a place of further processing/job work and that the same was used as a place of mere storage, on the other hand there is a findin....