Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (9) TMI 748

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., for the Respondent. [Order]. - In this appeal, filed by M/s. Flex Chemicals Ltd., the issue involved is whether the entire duty of Excise paid on Residual Fuel Oil (RFO) used as inputs is available as Modvat Credit or the Credit is restricted to the amount of Excise duty calculated at the rate of 10% ad valorem. 2. Shri Kailash Chander, Representative of the Appellants, submitted t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....itted that the issue involved has been decided by the following two decisions of the Tribunal:- (1) Camphor & Allied Products Ltd. v. CCE, Lucknow - [2002 (147) E.L.T. 600 (T)] = 2002 (51) RLT 169 (CEGAT) (2) CCE, Chandigarh v. Arti Steels Ltd. [2001 (138) E.L.T. 1066 (T)] = 2001 (47) RLT 571 (CEGAT). 3. Shri S.C. Pushkarna, learned D.R., reiterates the findings as containe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....bunal in the case of Arti Steels Ltd. (supra). The Tribunal has held that "since the RFO on which the Modvat Credit had been claimed by the Respondents does not stand covered by the Notification No. 14/97 which restrict the claim of the Modvat Credit in respect of the goods produced or manufactured in India to the extent of excise duty calculated at the rate of 10% ad valorem, we do not find any l....