Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1998 (12) TMI 561

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. - The benefit of exemption in terms of Notification 175/86 has been denied to the appellants herein on the ground that they were using the brand name "Yash" belonging to Yash Pharma Lab. P. Ltd., who was not availing the benefit of Notification 175/86, on two P or P medicines manufactured by them viz. "Lamolate Linctus" and....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....We have carefully considered the submissions of both sides. We find that the Department has not controverted or rebutted the appellants' claim that the monogram "Yash" belongs to them. In order to deny the benefit of SSI exemption, the Department will have to establish that the monogram 'Yash" belongs to some one other than the appellant who claims the benefit of the SSI exemption. Use of ones own....