Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2003 (10) TMI 365

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Respondent. [Order]. - The appeal is against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), dismissing an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Assistant Commissioner in which he has ordered confiscation of 250 kilogram of niacinamide manufactured and cleared by the appellant (with an option to redeem it on payment of fine of Rs. 20,000/- and imposed a penalty of Rs. 5,000/-. 2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oods and imposed a penalty on the ground that the requirement of Rule 52A has been contravened. The Commissioner (Appeals) has not found it possible to interfere with the Assistant Commissioner's order. 4. The ground in the appeal essentially is that duty had been paid on the goods and absence of the gate pass was due to a mistake on the part of the driver of the vehicle. As I have noted, ....