Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1999 (1) TMI 496

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....athod for the Respondents. JUDGMENT 1. The petitioners who are directors of the New City of Bombay Manufac-turing Co. Ltd., have preferred this petition under section 633(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act'). The respondents issued a show-cause notice dated 10-8-1992, to the petitioners calling on the petitioners to show cause as to why they should not be prosecuted for not holding the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... notice the petitioners apprehending that they will be prosecuted for violation of the provisions of the Companies Act have approached this Court by this petition filed under section 633(2). 2. An affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents. It is the contention of the respondents that this Court in some other proceedings have held that the powers of the High Court under section 633(2....