Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2003 (10) TMI 324

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondent. [Order]. - Heard both sides. 2. Appellants filed refund claim in pursuance to the order passed by the Tribunal, whereby order passed by the Customs Authority enhancing the value of imported telephones was set aside. 3. The adjudicating authority allowed the refund of Rs. 1,71,997/- and ordered the amount of Rs. 3,40,374/- to be credited to the Consumers Welfare ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....garding these Bills of Entry is that no importer will sell the goods on losses. 7. As the appellants filed the refund claim in consequence the order passed by the Tribunal, the presumption under the law is that appellants had passed the burden of duty. The presumption is a rebuttable presumption. The onus is on the assessee to show that portion of duty has not been passed on to the other p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... only rejected on the ground that in the Bill of Entry, the Model numbers of telephone were not mentioned. The contention of the appellants is that from this consignment that samples were drawn and appellants produced the copy of the wrapper of the sample which shows the Model No. LS-827. The contention of the appellants was also that price was enhanced by the Customs Authority while taking into c....