2003 (9) TMI 500

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... REPRESENTED BY: Shri S.V. Parelkar, JDR, for the Appellant. S/Shri V.S. Nankani and P.V. Sheth, Advocates, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. -  The above appeals arise out of separate orders of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) Ahmedabad granting refund of duties paid by the respondents herein on diesel oil engines procured by them, togeth....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e goods for the purpose of export outside India, subject to following the provisions of Chapter X of the Central Excise Rules. They were directed to apply to the Asstt. Commissioner for the said permission which they did under cover of letter, dated 9-12-1996. As no orders were passed on their application, they procured diesel engines on payment of duty, manufactured centrifugal pump sets and expo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....refund on the ground inter alia that there was no dispute that the diesel engines were used in the manufacture of pump sets exported during the relevant period and that the respondents had substantially complied with Notification No. 47/94 read with Rule 13 of the Central Excise Rules, that they had not made any rebate claim under Rule 12(l)(b) and that since the goods had been exported under Rule....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... cannot be held against the respondents. The Revenue does not dispute that the diesel engines procured by the respondents were used in the manufacture of export goods. There is also no dispute that Notification 47/94 claimed by the respondents was issued in exercise powers conferred by Rule 13 of the Central Excise Rules, wherein there is no bar to availment of drawback, unlike Rule 12 of the Cent....