Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2003 (8) TMI 271

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Respondent. [Order]. - The Revenue has filed the present appeal against the order of Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) vide which he has allowed the respondents' appeal in respect of their refund claim of Rs. 35,137/-. The respondents are absent in spite of today's notice of hearing having been sent to them. Accordingly I have heard Shri N.K. Mishra, ld. JDR. 2. Commissioner ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... case the said allegation was not there in the show cause notice and as such he has observed that the impugned order travelled beyond the scope of the notice. As regards the second point he has concluded that there is no requirement of Rule 173L to the effect that the remade goods should be cleared within a period of six months from the date of entry. It is sufficient if the goods are remade withi....