2003 (7) TMI 431
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. - Counsel for the appellant in his letter has requested adjournment on the ground that his client has filed a civil petition in the High Court of Gujarat "which is an essential evidence in the above referred case" and on the further ground that his client is in High Court for important matter and therefore, he could not get any instructi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....herefore decline to adjourn. 2. There is a delay of 34 days in filing each of these appeals. They were required to be filed on or before 23-4-2003 (after common orders made in them having been communicated on 23-1-2003) and were actually filed on 28-5-2003. The reason advanced for the delay is as follows. The entire affairs of the company are looked after by Sanjay Patil, a Director. His bro....