Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2003 (6) TMI 237

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Madhiam, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - After dispensing with the condition of pre-deposit of penalty of Rs. 1.00 lakh (Rupees one lakh) imposed upon the applicant/appellant under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, I take up the appeal itself with consent of both sides. 2. Shri B.K. Munshi, learned Consultant for the applicant/appellant submits that the penalty under ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oods were liable for confiscation. Accordingly, penalty under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, was set aside. 3. Shri J.R. Madhiam, learned J.D.R. for the Revenue, defends the impugned Order passed by the Commissioner. 4. I have considered the submissions made by both sides. Para 8.11 of the impugned Order reads as under :- "8.11. Sri K. Tharad is another director of....