2003 (5) TMI 293
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nt. Shri S.M. Tata, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice K.K. Usha, President]. - This is an appeal at the instance of the assessee challenging the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) dated 22/23-2-2003. 2. The appellants who are manufacturers of packet tea sell the same through their various depots located at different places. In their price declarations the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nk charges and interest on receivables is based on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CCE, New Delhi v. Vikram Detergent Ltd. reported in 2001 (127) E.L.T. 641. As mentioned earlier for denying the benefit of deduction in respect of interest on receivables, the only reason given by the Commissioner (Appeals) is that the element of this expenditure is not known beforehand. On ....
TaxTMI