Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2003 (5) TMI 287

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondent. [Order]. -  In this Appeal, the Revenue has questioned the validity of the impugned Order-in-Appeal dated 10-8-1995 vide which the Commissioner (Appeals) had remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority after setting aside the Order-in-Original for de novo proceeding after allowing cross-examination of the material witnesses to the respondents. 2. A perusal of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oss-examination of the witnesses but the adjudicating authority instead of acceding to the request, rather called upon them to disclose reasons for seeking cross-examination of the witnesses. Being not satisfied with the respondents explanation, the adjudicating authority disallowed cross-examination. Commr. (Appeals) has rightly set aside the Order-in-Original on the ground of violation of rules ....