Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2003 (3) TMI 462

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lant. None, for the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. - The notice issued to United Esters & Nitrochem Ltd., the respondent to this appeal, proposed to deny to it the benefit of the exemption contained in Notification 175/86 for the period 25-1-1991 to 31-3-1991 and to demand duty consequently not paid. The basis for the demand was that Cellulose Products of India Ltd. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....remises of Cellulose Products of India and this machinery, plant and premises became part of the assessee's plant thereafter. He therefore concluded that it was not correct to say that the entire goods cleared by the assessee between December, 1990 to March, 1991 were manufactured in the same factory as that of Cellulose Products of India Ltd. and found that there was no justification for denying ....