Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (12) TMI 458

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t. Shri V.L. Kumar, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Member (J)]. - Heard both sides. 2. Revenue filed this appeal against the order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the Commissioner (Appeals) held that mere putting colour cakes in a box along with brush does not amount to manufacture. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the respo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Tribunal in the case of C.C.E. v. Venelec Electromech Indus. (P) Ltd. reported in 2002 (141) E.L.T. 156 (T) = 2002 (49) RLT 393 (CEGAT) held that placing of different articles of cable jointing kit in the form of kit does not amount to manufacture. The Tribunal relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of XI Telecom Ltd. v. Superintendent of Central Excise rep....