2003 (5) TMI 252

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llant. S/Shri Sanjay Hagdey, Advocate for DA, Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Advocate, Deeptakirti, Manu Nair and Sanjeev Dahiya, Advocates, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice K.K. Usha, President]. - When this application to condone delay in filing the appeal by M/s. Shenyang Matsushita Storage Battery Co., China came up for hearing, Shri Chander Kohli, represented the appellant-applicant. He ma....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al is also produced before us. We are not inclined to grant adjournment as we find no bona fides in the prayer. We, therefore, proceed to dispose off the application to condone the delay on the basis of materials available on record before us. 2. The Appeals C/198, 203 and 204/2002-AD filed by M/s. Exide industries Ltd. and two others challenging the Notification No. 1/2002-Customs, dated 2-....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f on 7-1-2003, that in the above judgment, according to the appellant herein, an opportunity is granted by the Hon'ble High Court to interested parties to file appeal before this Tribunal and the appellant being an interested party, is seeking to file the present appeal. 4. We find no merit in the above averment made in the application to condone the delay. The relevant portion of the decisi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....203 and 204/2002 were at the instance of a manufacturer of the subject batteries in Bangladesh and an Indian importer of said batteries. Apart from the above, as mentioned, the present appellant as a respondent had participated in the proceedings before the Tribunal in Appeal Nos. 198, 203 and 204/2002. We concluded hearing of the appeals on 31-3-2003 much after the decision of the Calcutta High C....