Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (11) TMI 596

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Respondent. [Order]. -  The above captioned two appeals have been filed by the appellants against the common order-in-appeal dated 8-5-2002 vide which the Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld the order-in-original of the Asstt. Commissioner disallowing the  Modvat credit to the appellants. 2. In Appeal No. E/1919/2002-NB(S), the Modvat credit of Rs. 47,136/- had been ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....goods had not been also disputed. Therefore, by mentioning the words 'through agent' in the invoice by the manufacturer, the invoice did not become invalid under the law for the purpose of claiming Modvat credit. The impugned order of the Commissioner (Appeals) as such cannot be sustained and is set aside. 3. This takes me to Appeal No. E/1920/2002-NB(S). In this appeal, the Modvat cred....