2003 (1) TMI 362

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by Notification No. 64/94-C.E., dated 1-3-94. The appellant were supplying HDPE pipes to the Telecom and other departments of the Government under rate contracts entered into between them and the Government. On 28-2-94 the applicants cleared certain quantities of HDPE pipes to the Government departments without payment of duty, claiming exemption under Notification No. 14/92-C.E. ibid. The Inspecting Authority (Additional Director General, DGS&D, New Delhi) had duly inspected the goods before clearance thereof from the appellants' factories in terms of the rate contracts. However, it was only on 7-3-94 that the Inspecting Authority issued its inspection notes to the appellants. The Central Excise department took the view that the appellant....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed during a period of exemption and cleared from the factory after that period, were still entitled to exemption. 6. Ld. DR, on the other hand, submits that under the rate contracts, the goods were liable to be cleared only under cover of Inspection Notes of the Inspecting Authority. In the instant case, the inspection notes were issued admittedly on 7-3-94 only and the goods covered by the notes should have been cleared only on or after 7-3-94. Had the goods been so cleared, the duty of excise at Tariff rate would have been payable as on 7-3-94. The goods were not exempt from payment of duty of excise, exemption Notification having been rescinded on 1-3-94. Ld. DR also submits that the goods in question were cleared on 28-2-94 in v....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... decisions would arise for consideration. For the same reasons, the Tribunal's decision in FGP Ltd. (supra) cited by the counsel would also not be applicable to this case. 8. The only ground raised by the department in the show cause notice for demanding duty on the subject goods is that although the goods were dispatched from the appellants' factory after inspection by the Government authorities, the dispatch was not covered by Inspection Notes in terms of the rate contracts. I have perused the terms and conditions of the rate contract brought on record by the counsel. The tenor of the contract is that all supplies of excisable goods to Government departments should be preceded by physical inspection by the Inspecting Authority, wh....