2002 (12) TMI 338

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....-wamy, Advocates, for the Appellant. Ms. Bhagyadevi, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J) (Oral)]. - In all these 12 appeals a common question of law and facts are involved hence, they are taken up together for disposal as per law. The appellants claimed the benefit of Customs Notification No. 81/95 in respect of packing materials namely paper Board Boxes and Pape....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s clearly noted that the benefit of notification C.N. 81/95 is applicable to packing materials but, however, in view of the Apex Court judgment he was not willing to grant the benefit of the notification and dismissed the appeals. Hence, all these appeals. 2. We have heard ld. Advocate, Shri. Radhakrishnan and Shri Arokiaswamy, Consultant along with Shri Suresh, CA, for the appellants and ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Apex Court rendered in the case of M/s. Prestige Engg. (I) Ltd. We have perused this judgment and notice that the Hon'ble Apex Court had rendered its judgment in the context of the Notification No. 119/75-C.E., which pertains to job work carried out by the small scale manufactures. Therefore, the Notification No. 119/75-C.E. dealt with in M/s. Prestige Engg. India Ltd. has no bearing on the inte....