2001 (3) TMI 962
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....m-II had dismissed the complaint. Aggrieved by the order of the District Forum-II, the present appeal has been filed by the appellant/complainant. 2. Briefly, the appellant/complainant, Mrs. Bhupinder Kaur resident of Kothi No. 562, Phase-I (Sector 55), SAS Nagar, Mohali, deposited Rs. 15,000 with the respondent/opposite party, J.C.T. Ltd., Thapar House, 124, Janpath, New Delhi-110 001 (opposite party No. 1), through opposite party No. 2, Bajaj Capital Investment Centre Ltd., S.C.O. Nos. 89-91, Sector 17-D, Chandigarh and a fixed deposit receipt bearing No. 101473 with maturity dated 8-8-1997 was received from J.C.T. Ltd., the respondent/opposite party No. 1. As per averments made in the complaint since the maturity amount of Rs. 17,370 ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....0 dismissed the complaint and the order reads as under : "In the reply filed by the opposite party, it is stated that amount has been sent to the complainant. In these circumstances, the complaint is dismissed." 5. Aggrieved against the above order, this appeal was filed by Mrs. Bhupinder Kaur wherein the main relief prayed for is as under : (a)to grant Rs. 2,344 as interest at the rate of 18 per cent for delay and deficiency in service on payment of Rs. 17,370; (b)to grant compensation of Rs. 1,000 for unnecessary harassment and inconvenience caused to the complainant; (c)to grant legal expenses of Rs. 1,000; (d)to grant any other relief deems fit by this Hon'ble Forum. 6. The appellant has averred that the District Fo....
TaxTMI