Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (10) TMI 500

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. -  The issue involved in the present appeal is as to whether the Special Additional Duty (SAD) is applicable in respect of imports made from Nepal prior to issuance of Notification No. 124/2000-Cus., dated 29-9-2000 vide which the earlier Notification No. 37/96-Cus. was amended. 2. While deciding the case the adjudica....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... said additional duty of customs is payable for any reason"(highlight added). Thus the Notification per se provides two situations where the SAD will be exempt from levy on imported goods; first where both the Basic Customs duty and the additional Customs Duty is exempt and secondly where the Free rates of duty are prescribed as basic customs duty and the additional customs duty is exempted or ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... basic customs duty is exempted and the additional duty of customs nil, SAD is leviable under Section 3A of the Customs Tariff Act read with the said Notification 18/2000. 3. It is also admitted by the ld. Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant that during the relevant period i.e. from 1-4-2000 to 10-9-2000 when Masor Dal was imported by the appellant there was no exemption from Spe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....be substituted". 4. The appellants' contention is that the above notification should be considered as clarificatory and hence retrospective in nature so as to allow the benefit of the same to the imports made prior to the amendment. The authorities below have observed that the use of the expression `further' in the notification leaves no doubt that the same is applicable only prospectively....