Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (8) TMI 655

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for the Appellant. Shri Arun Chopra, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. - Appeals taken up for disposal with the consent of both sides, after waiving deposit. 2. Nitin Steels of which the proprietor is Rekha Singhal and Tighwell Fasteners the proprietor is J.N. Singhal, both manufacturer bolts and studs. The notice issued to these concerns and to thei....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) dismissing the appeals for failure to deposit the duty. 3. In each of these order impugned in the first bunch of appeals, the, Additional Commissioner has said that on the order to club the value of clearances of Nitin Steel and Tightwell Fasteners and ordered recovery of duty of excise of Rs. 17,10,260/-. He has thereafter imposed penalties on Nit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ation. When confronted with this position, the departmental representative is unable to reconcile what appears to be the two contradictory stands. In the light of this, we are of the view that the ratio of the Supreme Court is squarely applicable to the facts before us. The basis for denial of the exemption to Tightwell Fasteners is only on the view that Nitin Steels is not a separately existing u....