2002 (8) TMI 650

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Shri S.C. Pushkarna, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  The appellants filed a refund claim of Rs. 51,720/- on the ground that they had cleared Pig Iron and C.I. Skull to three different buyers on payment of duty under Rule 47F(i)(ii) at the rates higher than the purchase value and thus paid excess duty. This claim is made for the excess duty paid during the period from 12-11-95 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the claim of refund filed by the party is accompanied by the documents which clearly show that the claimant charged and recovered the duty component from their buyers as revealed from the outgoing invoices issued by the claimant at the time of clearance of their excisable goods; that the claimant fully realised the duty component which is in turn was passed on to its said buyers. He has observed ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rna, JDR, for the respondents. The ld. Counsel for the appellants does not dispute the facts as enumerated above that the appellants had charged and recovered the duty component from the buyers as revealed from the outgoing invoices issued by them at the time of clearance of the excisable goods and that they fully realised the duty component and it was passed on their buyers at the time of sale of....