2001 (11) TMI 907
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ate Laws<br>J. CHELAMESWAR, J. G. Ramachandraiah for the Petitioner. Anil Kumar for the Respondent. ORDER 1. Company Application No. 219 of 2000 was dismissed by a learned single Judge of this Court on 8-8-2000. In fact, the matter was taken up for hearing on an earlier occasion on 20-7-2000. There was no representation on behalf of the applicant on that day. Therefore, the lear....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ts and circumstances of the case, we are of the considered view that sufficient reasons have been shown for the delay in filing the petition to restore C.A. No. 219 of 2000 and it is a fit case where the delay has to be condoned. The OSA is accordingly allowed and the learned single Judge is directed to take up the company application and pass appropriate orders." I am bound by the result of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....udicial orders would remain on the permanent record of the Court, I do not want either the contemporary society or the prosterity to believe otherwise. 4. Over a period of time such incidents would result in the accretion of dangerous power. I am only tempted to quote. Frankferter J: "The accretion of dangerous power does not come in a day. It does come, however, slowly, from the generati....
TaxTMI