2002 (10) TMI 437
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ppellant. Shri R.C. Sankhla, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. - The applications before us have been filed by M/s. Varun Cements Ltd., Shri S.L. Thakur and Shri Rajesh Thakur, the appellants in Appeal No. E/2757/2001, Appeal No. E/2758/2001 and Appeal No. E/2759/2001 respectively. The jurisdictional Commissioner has, by his order impugned in the appeals befo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ur notice, Order dated 26-8-99 of the BIFR in case No. 163/99 (copy available on record). The Counsel further submits that the penalties imposed by the Commissioner on the two functionaries of the company will not be sustainable in law as there is no finding in the impugned order as to in what manner the said persons were liable to be penalized under Rule 209A. 4. Ld. DR opposes the prayer....
TaxTMI