Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (4) TMI 778

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  The Appellant was issued a show cause notice alleging as follows as regards his role - Shri Hamir Sajan Ahir of village Kenedi residing at 9, Patel Colony, Jamnagar has indulged in landing, acquiring, possessing, keeping, removing, harbouring, transporting, concealing 31 packages of Computer parts and 250 slabs of silver imported illicitly into Indi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....considering the material on record concluded the role of the present appellant as follows : Further though H.S. Ahir has denied his involvement in the instant case of smuggling vide his statement dtd. 10-11-93, he has confessed his involvement in other customs seizure cases and has admitted that he was detained under COFEPOSA in 1986. 3. And thereafter came to a conclusion that since th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng him liable for penalty in the present case. They could be consideration for quantum only. Penalty under Section 112 have to be arrived at, after determining the acts if any, of having handled, with prior knowledge, these goods in the case in question were smuggled and were liable for confiscation. The mere fact that the person past conduct is suspect and dubious can not be a cause of imposition....