Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1994 (8) TMI 262

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Sehgal for the Respondent. JUDGMENT 1. In C.P. No. 46 of 1984, this Court passed a preliminary decree on 2-12-1985, and final decree on 15-1-1987, against Bareja Knipping Fasteners Ltd. (company in liquidation) and three of its directors with costs and interest. In this execution application, the decree-holder has claimed a sum of Rs. 19,07,800 due from the judgment debtors with future interest ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by Raghunath Rai Bareja, judgment-debtor. 2. Objections have been filed by the judgment-debtors under Order 21, rule 23(2) read with section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. It has been averred that property belonging to the companies such as Bareja Industries (P.) Ltd., Bareja Pumps (P.) Ltd. cannot be attached and sold in execution of a decree passed against Bareja Knipping Fasteners L....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Civil Procedure Code, whereby they have disclosed their assets and the property owned by them. The decree-holder is at liberty to get any property attached for recovery of the decretal amount. This application is disposed of as indicated above." 3. I find force in the objections taken by the respondents. The decree passed against Bareja Knipping Fasteners Ltd., cannot be satisfied by attachment ....