2008 (8) TMI 554
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... Kirti Renu Mishra, Ms. Mukti Chowdhary, Amit Kumar Singh and Shantanu Krishna, Advocates, with him) for the respondents. R.F. Nariman, Senior Advocate (for IOC) and V.A. Bobde, Senior Advocate (for BPCL) (Hrishikesh Baruah, Raka Bejoy Phookan, Arjun Bobde, Shailesh Madiyal and Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Advocates, with them) for the appellants. ----------------------------------------....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....onal authority partly allowed the revision petition and directed the appellant to pay a sum of Rs. 65 lakhs. Being aggrieved, a writ petition came to be filed by the appellant-company. By the impugned order, the High Court directed the appellant-BPCL to pay a sum of Rs. 20 lakhs pending hearing and final disposal of the appeal by the Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax. Hence this civil appeal. N....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....is directed to hear and dispose of the first appeal pending before him within a period of three months from today. Before concluding, we may also record that BPCL through its counsel has given an undertaking to this court that in the event of the department succeeding in the appeal pending before the Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Cuttack, it will pay the tax due with interest in accordance....