Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (11) TMI 887

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....K. Jain, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  Today an application for stay has come. As the matter lies in a narrow compass, the appeal is taken up for disposal after waiving disposal, with consent of both sides. 2. The appellant manufactures inter alia tyres, tubes, flaps etc. at Nasik and the said goods fall under Chapter 40 of the CETA. The appellant availed Modvat credit i.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... made as to the showing of the disputed invoice but actually should be mentioned as billable delivery note. At page 23 the specific ground has been taken before the appellate authority in the following terms :- "(d) The Additional Commissioner has erred in disallowing the Modvat credit of the amount of Rs. 3,60,066/- on the grounds that the debit entry shown in the invoice appears not corr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in Invoice No. 947 of 1995 of L&T Mcneil Ltd. was also produced. The Additional Commissioner has failed to take the same into consideration and disallowed the Modvat credit on the flimsy and irrelevant grounds." 3. During the hearing, it is represented before me that the appellants produced letter written by the Superintendent of Central Excise, Range VIIF Division VII, Madras 34. The let....