2000 (7) TMI 878

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t. Shri R.K. Roy, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - The short question involved in the present appeal is as to whether the inputs manufactured by the appellant and consumed captively in the manufacture of the final product should be included in the aggregate clearances value of final product in terms of Explanation II to Notification No. 1/93-CE dated 2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ays for allowing appeal. 3. Countering the arguments, Shri R.K. Roy, ld. JDR submits that the appellant's final product is exempted under a Notification different than 1/93. Explanation III to Notification No. 1/93 is not granting exemption to the items which are captively consumed by the appellants. It is only to the effect that their value of clearances would not be taken into considerat....