Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (8) TMI 539

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....T.K. Kar, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. -  We have heard Shri S.C. Rudra, ld. Consultant for the appellants and Shri T.K. Kar, ld. SDR for the Revenue. 2. As per the facts on record, the appellants imported hospital equipments free of duty under Notification 64/88-Cus., dated 1-3-88. Subsequently, they were issued a notice under Section 28(i)....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by the Assistant Commissioner before any Higher Appellate Forum and the instant appeal filed against the notice issued under Section 142 of the Customs Act, 1962, is not maintainable. 3. Appellants have admitted that the order confirming demand of duty by the Assistant Commissioner passed on 23/30-10-96 was not challenged by them, before Commissioner (Appeals). However, they submitted tha....