Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2002 (7) TMI 542

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r transportation of the betel nuts and belonging to M/s. Abhiyan Carriers Ltd., has also been confiscated under Section 115 (2) of the Customs Act, 1962 with an option to redeem the same on payment of fine of Rs. 50,000/-. Personal penalty of Rs. 20,000/- each has been imposed upon the said two appellants. Further personal penalty of Rs. 10,000/- has been imposed upon Shri Tiwari, General Manager of M/s. Abhiyan Carriers Ltd. 2. Shri P.K. Das, ld. Advocate appearing for the appellants submits that the entire case of the Revenue is based upon the fact that the betel nuts in question were of foreign origin and that the same were smuggled from Nepal into India. For holding the foreign origin character of the betel nuts, the Adjudicatin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ecific information and the same are concrete evidences that the seized betel nuts have been illegally imported into India from Nepal. The appellants' contention is that such general information received by the Revenue Department cannot take the place of evidence for holding that the betel nuts in question are smuggled. 4. In support of this above submission, he places reliance upon the following decisions of the Tribunal :- (i)      M/s. Laxmi Narayan Sharma & Ors. v. Commr. of Customs, Patna - 2002 (142) E.L.T. 74 (T) = 2002 (49) RLT 353 (CEGAT-Kol.); (ii)     Cheddu Prasad & Ors. v. Commr. of Customs (P), Patna - 2002 (150) E.L.T. 687 (Tribunal) = 2002 (48) RLT 587 (CEGAT-Kol.); ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ot ipso facto can take the place of proof of the foreign origin nature of the betel nuts. The adjudicating authority has nowhere discussed that it is only the betel nuts of foreign origin which can be chemically treated and the betel nuts of Indian origin can not be chemically treated. As such, I find that the appellant succeeds on the first ground itself as regards the foreign origin nature of the betel nuts. 7. In any case, I find that there is no concrete evidence produced by the Revenue to show that the betel nuts have been smuggled from Nepal. The Commissioner has observed that there is general information about the importation of huge quantity of betel nuts from Nepal. However, such an information cannot be made the basis for ....